Lessons from The Pursuit of Dominance in Search

Lessons from The Pursuit of Dominance in Search

Lessons from The Pursuit of Dominance in Search

This strategic lesson comes from a strategy that by its very size precludes serious consideration of alternatives. Firms that don’t have the vision to challenge their own assumptions will falter. The big search firms hold at strategic positions tied too closely to their own success. More importantly, to each other’s successes as the primary model of competitive positioning. This can stifle creativity and the adoption of new ideas because the benchmark becomes the strategies of the few competitors, not the innovations that still exist in the blue space of untested ideas, which will eventually be tested by new entrants, and thus disruptive and destructive to incumbents.

The robot that goes through your desk and discovers just what you want when you want it seems like the ideal invention. That is until you want something else next to it or like it, and then you have to send your robot out to look for that too. As I was pondering this “feature” recently, I was struck by a bigger industry question: are investments in advertising-based search by Google, Microsoft and Yahoo impeding the development of better information management tools? I think the answer is YES!

Search is very successful, but for day-to-day work, I find it pretty useless. It doesn’t use the metadata in my system, or across my web of associations to help me cluster and organize, reveal and suggest. It just does what IBM”s chess programs do for chess – put a brut force algorithm in place to single-mindedly go after the piece of information that I happen to have top of mind.

My machine, my Net-life, however, is much richer than the last thing I asked for. If my machine, the Net, my information providers, paid as much attention to what I was doing, as they do to where I have been (in order to suggest ads to me) then they might actually suggest meaningful information to me, either from my own collection or from elsewhere. My metadata can inform my experience.

I believe the future of information management is overdue for a technological disruption, and all of this pandering to search will seem meaningless, and the business models built around them so trivial and confining, as soon as information starts finding you.

Daniel W. Rasmus

Daniel W. Rasmus, Founder and Principal Analyst of Serious Insights, is an internationally recognized speaker on the future of work and education. He is the author of several books, including Listening to the Future and Management by Design.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.