• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Services
    • Vendor Advisory Services
    • IT Advisory Services
    • Business Advisory Services
    • Serious Insights Agile Thinking Workshops
    • Innovation Workshops
    • Serious Insights Keynotes
    • Strategy Advisory Services
    • Thought Leadership & Content Marketing
  • Reviews
    • All Hardware Reviews
    • Headphone Reviews
    • USB-C Hub Reviews
    • SeriousPop.Tech
    • Software Reviews
  • Advisory Research
    • Serious Insights on AI
    • Serious Insights Interviews
    • Strategy & Scenario Planning
    • Serious Insights on Collaboration
    • Hybrid Work
    • Knowledge Management
    • Management
    • Learning Reimagined
    • Serious Insights: The 10s
    • Special Reports
    • Sponsored Research
    • USG Scenario Planning Videos
  • About Us
    • About Serious Insights
    • About Daniel W. Rasmus
    • Daniel W. Rasmus Appearances
    • Daniel W. Rasmus Videos
    • Clients
    • Headshots
    • Books
      • Management by Design
      • Listening to the Future
      • Twelve Ways to Escape an Alien
      • Older Books
    • Daniel W. Rasmus World Travel
    • Dan’s Quotes
    • Community
    • Site Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • Contact Us
    • Contact Us
    • Book Daniel W. Rasmus
    • Serious Bookkeeping
    • Product Evaluation Request Form
    • Wedding Ceremonies
Serious Insights

Serious Insights

Research and reviews from strategist, futurist and analyst Daniel W. Rasmus

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Meeting Design Don’ts: How to Design a Meeting by Avoiding These 13 Terrible Meeting Design Don’ts

October 16, 2020 by Daniel W. Rasmus Leave a Comment

Meeting Design Don’ts

If you apply our DOs of meeting design, you can probably avoid most of the Meeting Design Don’ts. But sometimes, people need a reminder that bad behavior influences design.

The Management by Design methodology explores a number of ways to arrive at rules like this by applying ideas like simplicity, equitability, forgiveness, and flexibility. It suggests that organizations recognize policies and practices, technology, and space as the levers for design.

The emphasis on these rules focuses mostly on policy and practice, and technology–they outline negative behaviors that move away from good design, such as considering the rhythm and motion of an organization as metaphors for goals and objectives. Perceptibility proves most important to meeting preparation, however, because it asks people to regularly and openly share so the organization develops a near real-time understanding of work–who is doing it, where it is taking play, and why.

How to Design a Meeting: Meeting Design Don'ts

Poor meetings reflect poor management. Good meeting design reinforces professional management practices. For many, the best meeting is the meeting that doesn’t happen, and these rules account for that. Design calls for elegance, and elegance implies minimalism and efficiency. Do what is necessary well, avoiding the unnecessary.

These DON’T’s complement the DOs in this post, both of which originated with an infographic that can be found here.

Meeting Design Don'ts PDF image

Download the Infographic


All of these principals apply as much to virtual meetings as they do to face-to-face meetings.

Meeting Design Don’ts

Don’t hold the meeting if no one believes it will provide value. Yes, the first design principle is that if you really don’t need a meeting, don’t hold one. Sometimes managers will say, “I’m holding to our time commitment since we block this time for a meeting. Let’s hold it even if we aren’t what’s on the agenda for today.” If you don’t know the agenda, then you don’t need a meeting. Without an agenda, people will arrive and do the design work in the meeting. Perhaps after ten or fifteen minutes, they will conclude that they don’t need the meeting. That’s a waste of everyone’s time.

The “will provide value” clause of this admonition implies that the meeting managers remain in touch with participants and discuss upcoming meetings ahead of the meeting. Rather than assume a meeting because of schedule, consider assuming meetings to be canceled unless otherwise needed. That changes the mindset, so those with agenda items that require a meeting will feel obligated to justify any agenda item they propose.

“The “will provide value” clause of this admonition implies that the meeting managers remain in touch with participants and discuss upcoming meetings ahead of the meeting. Rather than assume a meeting because of schedule, consider assuming meetings to be canceled unless otherwise needed. That changes the mindset, so those with agenda items that require a meeting will feel obligated to justify any agenda item they propose.

Don’t assume everybody wants to be at the meeting. An invitation, even the acceptance of an invitation, does not mean the attendee wants to be at the meeting. I have been in too many meetings to count where something else I was doing was important to me and often more important to the collective goals of the organization than the meeting I was about to attend. Give people the option of not going.

If content and actions live in a repository and everything is up-to-date, people can catch up. Collaboration tools allow even non-attendees to add their collective wisdom to answer questions or overcome obstacles. Meetings need to have a purpose for the attendees—and if they don’t, then allow the attendee to opt-out.

Don’t invite people who don’t need to be in the meeting. There is a difference between want and need. Sometimes people who don’t want to be in a meeting require prodding because they are needed in the meeting.

Don’t backchannel. E-mail, side conversations, and other forms of backchanneling keep concerns and negotiations hidden—people don’t feel included, and that may lead to them not wanting to attend a meeting. No influence and no input equals no interest. Meetings can have perpetual collaboration spaces in the majority of collaboration tools. Use those spaces to elevate all of the work and all of the thinking. When a meeting is required, it will become evident.

Don’t come unprepared. A well-designed meeting functions best with attendees who consider their participation before they arrive. An agenda sent out with sufficient lead time should result in no surprises.

Don’t ask, “Does anyone has anything else to put on the agenda?” This is a reinforcement for a good agenda. A team co-creates a good agenda. Asking this question implies a disconnect between the members of the meeting. People should be up-to-speed on what is going on and why the necessity of the meeting. Co-creating the agenda forces people to share ahead of the meeting, ensuring the meeting focuses only on important topics.

Don’t ask, “Does anyone have anything else to put on the agenda?” This is a reinforcement for a good agenda. A team co-creates a good agenda. Asking this question implies a disconnect between the members of the meeting. People should be up-to-speed on what is going on and why the necessity of the meeting. Co-creating the agenda forces people to share ahead of the meeting, ensuring the meeting focuses only on important topics.

Don’t deviate from the agenda. If teams co-create agendas, then the important items are on the list—the time commitment of the agenda should focus on solving or informing on agenda items.

Don’t e-mail anything to anybody about the meeting. Meetings should have a meeting space. Meeting spaces should automatically remind attendees of a meeting. Keep all content in the meeting space

Don’t load the Meeting Space with duplicate copies of files. Learn the workflow and the tools. If a document includes shared editing features, use those features. Do not download a copy of a file, update it, and then expect others to figure out what you did. This remains an all too common practice even when documents offer shared authorship and annotations. Duplicate copies confuse people, and they create extra work.

Don’t use the Meeting Space to capture discussions about projects or tasks with their own collaboration spaces. If you are working on a shared document that lives in a project space, and that document comes up in the meeting, go to that project space or document directly and place comments and actions there. A meeting may not include all of the stakeholders for a document, decision, or discussion—by keeping the discussions focused on the object of the discussion, those not in the meeting remain informed about the evolution of the idea or the content.

Don’t take minutes. In a modern workspace, minutes make no sense. Posting tasks, assigning action items, sharing information, and updating content with annotations constitute the new minutes. The work of the meeting is the work itself, not a commentary on agreements about the work.

And with AI becoming more available for meetings, teams will be able to take notes and actions through verbal instruction to the AI, eliminating the need to stop and create a task. Eventually, the Ais may assign tasks without being asked by inferring agreements among the participants and automatically documenting those agreements. No information should be shared first in a meeting unless sharing the new information represents the meeting’s design intent.

Don’t confuse a status meeting with a working meeting. Be clear on the agenda if a meeting is about sharing or solving. Meeting designs unclear about their purpose lead to frustration among attendees.


For more serious insights on collaboration, click here.

For another perspective, see Dan’s Fast Company post: Telecommuting Works If You Intentionally Design It.

Did you find Meeting Design Don’ts helpful? Have a question? Leave a comment!

Share this post:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

Filed Under: Collaboration, Management by Design

Reader Interactions

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Serious Insights

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7,849 other subscribers

Download the 2026 State of AI Report

Amazon Associate

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Hit Amazon Haul for Amazing Discounts.

Also, take a look at these links for additional Amazon discounts.

Today’s Deals.
Up to 80% Off
Crazy Low-Priced Finds
Under $5
Brand Scores

Dan’s poetry. Only on Kindle. Read today!

Top Posts

  • JBL Tour Pro 2 Review: Excellent Headphones That Crush With Their NextGen Case
    JBL Tour Pro 2 Review: Excellent Headphones That Crush With Their NextGen Case
  • JLab Epic Air Sport ANC Gen 2 Review: Sports Earbuds that Go the Extra Mile
    JLab Epic Air Sport ANC Gen 2 Review: Sports Earbuds that Go the Extra Mile
  • Tozo HT2 ANC Headphones Review: Inexpensive Headphones That Impress for the Price
    Tozo HT2 ANC Headphones Review: Inexpensive Headphones That Impress for the Price
  • Jabra Elite 10 Earbuds Review: The Jabra Flagship Continues to Improve on Comfort and Features
    Jabra Elite 10 Earbuds Review: The Jabra Flagship Continues to Improve on Comfort and Features
  • 12 Hybrid Work Fears Managers Must Face
    12 Hybrid Work Fears Managers Must Face

Buy my space adventure only on Kindle.

Recent Comments

  • JBL Tour Pro 2 Review: Worth It? Specs, Comparison & More - Coastal Journal on JBL Tour Pro 2 Review: Excellent Headphones That Crush With Their NextGen Case
  • AI PCs Want Higher Labels Than AI PC – blog.aimactgrow.com on Acer Aspire 16 AI Qualcomm Review: Snapdragon X Value Laptop with Copilot+ Trade-offs
  • AI PCs Need Better Labels Than AI PC on Acer Aspire 16 AI Qualcomm Review: Snapdragon X Value Laptop with Copilot+ Trade-offs
  • OWC Thunderbolt Dock (14-Port) Review: One Dock, and One Cable, to Rule Them All on EZQuest USB-C Slim Gen 2 Hub Adapter 6-in-1 Review: A Speedy Modern Hub for Modern Work
  • Lenovo’s Qira is a Bet on Ambient, Cross-device AI—and on a New Kind of Operating System on “The Future of AI Isn’t What You Think” from Foxit Featuring a Daniel W. Rasmus Interview

Footer

Sitemap

  • Blogs
  • Book Daniel W. Rasmus
  • About Daniel W. Rasmus
  • Serious Insights LLC Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

Archives

Tag Cloud

ABC Apple AR artificial intelligence Big Data Buffy the Vampire Slayer BusinessWeek Cengage CIO Magazine CIOs Cisco context coronavirus Customer Service Dell Disney Disneyland earbud review Enterprise 2.0 facebook Fast Company Feedback loops Harvard Business Review HBR HP IBM Innovation Instagram iPhone case JBL Kindle Knowledge Management life-long learning Logitech Management By Design Microsoft mission statement Netflix New Scientist Nokia scenario planning Star Trek Stephen Elop Thought Leadership VR

Copyright 2009-2026 Serious Insights LLC | Log in

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

%d
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

    Strictly Necessary Cookies

    Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.